Birdwatch Archive - Rating Details

Birdwatch Note Rating

2024-05-27 17:26:50 UTC - NOT_HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: 2F721EDDC4568BFAFC245BA262B20D0F7C078A327E2940D699943CBBA73294FD
Participant Details

Original Note:

ArchivoVAR no toma en consideración todas las jugadas polémicas, además interpreta, según sus propios criterios, los aciertos y errores del VAR. Es una conclusión totalmente subjetiva. Se basa en las opiniones personales del autor, y no en hechos objetivos e irrefutables. https://www.marca.com/futbol/real-madrid/2024/01/25/65b1f54fe2704ec1a08b45b3.html

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

noteId - 1795027425048313906
participantId -
raterParticipantId - 2F721EDDC4568BFAFC245BA262B20D0F7C078A327E2940D699943CBBA73294FD
createdAtMillis - 1716830810478
version - 2
agree - 0
disagree - 0
helpful - 0
notHelpful - 0
helpfulnessLevel - NOT_HELPFUL
helpfulOther - 0
helpfulInformative - 0
helpfulClear - 0
helpfulEmpathetic - 0
helpfulGoodSources - 0
helpfulUniqueContext - 0
helpfulAddressesClaim - 0
helpfulImportantContext - 0
helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 0
notHelpfulOther - 0
notHelpfulIncorrect - 1
notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 0
notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 0
notHelpfulOutdated - 0
notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 1
notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 0
notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 1
notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 1
notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
ratingsId - 17950274250483139062F721EDDC4568BFAFC245BA262B20D0F7C078A327E2940D699943CBBA73294FD