Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2024-05-28 06:16:33 UTC - NOT_HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: E48A5C23DC6DBBACA332BD58A17B306ECB7A4628305346A8666CE2714A62BD49
Participant Details

Original Note:

NNN. Fancy Moss Kingbird, the rule of proportionality of attack under international humanitarian law is focused on foreseeability in the circumstances at time of attack. A retrospective account of the civilian-to-combatant ratio doesn’t, as such, signify violation of the rule. https://www.chathamhouse.org/sites/default/files/publications/research/2018-12-10-proportionality-conduct-hostilities-incidental-harm-gillard-final.pdf

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1794900174097031646
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - E48A5C23DC6DBBACA332BD58A17B306ECB7A4628305346A8666CE2714A62BD49
  • createdAtMillis - 1716876993108
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - NOT_HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 0
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 0
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 0
  • helpfulImportantContext - 0
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 0
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 1
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 0
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 0
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 0
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
  • ratingsId - 1794900174097031646E48A5C23DC6DBBACA332BD58A17B306ECB7A4628305346A8666CE2714A62BD49