Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2024-06-02 21:07:46 UTC - HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: 136266823D794265F6B21F662DEDC52389F919710CCD0FAAF78E00BF95A37BD7
Participant Details

Original Note:

NNN. Fancy Moss Kingbird, the rule of proportionality of attack under international humanitarian law is focused on foreseeability in the circumstances at time of attack. A retrospective account of the civilian-to-combatant ratio doesn’t, as such, signify violation of the rule. https://www.chathamhouse.org/sites/default/files/publications/research/2018-12-10-proportionality-conduct-hostilities-incidental-harm-gillard-final.pdf

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1794900174097031646
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - 136266823D794265F6B21F662DEDC52389F919710CCD0FAAF78E00BF95A37BD7
  • createdAtMillis - 1717362466039
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 1
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 1
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 1
  • helpfulImportantContext - 1
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 1
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 0
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 0
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 0
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
  • ratingsId - 1794900174097031646136266823D794265F6B21F662DEDC52389F919710CCD0FAAF78E00BF95A37BD7