Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2024-06-30 03:34:34 UTC - NOT_HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: 64418734CE6308EF4C21457B67769124239F3EA481D5AD666515811730CFA0D4
Participant Details

Original Note:

The proposed note ignores the fact that the rest of the thread rebuts the note, citing 1st sources. It reads like and probably is a thin attempt by members of the agencies in question to impeach the thread.

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1794737022462251143
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - 64418734CE6308EF4C21457B67769124239F3EA481D5AD666515811730CFA0D4
  • createdAtMillis - 1719718474467
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - NOT_HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 0
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 0
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 0
  • helpfulImportantContext - 0
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 0
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 1
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 1
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 1
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 1
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 1
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 1
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
  • ratingsId - 179473702246225114364418734CE6308EF4C21457B67769124239F3EA481D5AD666515811730CFA0D4