Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2024-05-27 11:47:58 UTC - NOT_HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: 2B7D0AD2796403AB00907B621FD52DC065DDC6B0CEF8B34E8037B3F3F2D77209
Participant Details

Original Note:

本ポストは抗議の声があった旨とそれに対する関係者の見解を示しているもので、誤解を招いていません。「健康診断で見落としがあった」という報道から「上半身裸での健康診断が必要」というノート投稿者の個人的な見解を導くノートは不要です。

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1794700332007899243
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - 2B7D0AD2796403AB00907B621FD52DC065DDC6B0CEF8B34E8037B3F3F2D77209
  • createdAtMillis - 1716810478448
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - NOT_HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 0
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 0
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 0
  • helpfulImportantContext - 0
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 0
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 0
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 0
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 1
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
  • ratingsId - 17947003320078992432B7D0AD2796403AB00907B621FD52DC065DDC6B0CEF8B34E8037B3F3F2D77209