Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2024-05-26 23:06:51 UTC - HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: D777E512EFC4F45415603E4F09039634745233EB9B2CC2CEC6B4BC0F9D7A188C
Participant Details

Original Note:

This was a result of a clerical reporting error from the county, and did not reflect the actual count of the ballots. This has been widely reported on, and is not an example of vote fraud. https://www.reuters.com/article/idUSKBN27L2RF/

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1794697797427507545
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - D777E512EFC4F45415603E4F09039634745233EB9B2CC2CEC6B4BC0F9D7A188C
  • createdAtMillis - 1716764811495
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 1
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 1
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 1
  • helpfulImportantContext - 1
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 1
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 0
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 0
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 0
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
  • ratingsId - 1794697797427507545D777E512EFC4F45415603E4F09039634745233EB9B2CC2CEC6B4BC0F9D7A188C