Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2024-05-26 10:07:58 UTC - HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: E19DC08B3C88EB563D16CB538874F1AE7AEFEA0A83A02316818E21DAC25058D6
Participant Details

Original Note:

リンク先にあるように投稿者が触れているのは症例研究です。適切な対照条件と比較していない症例報告は薬剤の効果の研究にせよ副作用の研究にせよ「科学的根拠がない」、とされるエビデンスレベルの研究であり↓ https://medical.nikkeibp.co.jp/leaf/all/cancernavi/series/kenkyu/201905/560545.html その疾患がワクチンが起こす疾患だと判明したという意味では全くない事に注意が必要です。

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1794661980252606933
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - E19DC08B3C88EB563D16CB538874F1AE7AEFEA0A83A02316818E21DAC25058D6
  • createdAtMillis - 1716718078353
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 1
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 0
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 0
  • helpfulImportantContext - 1
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 1
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 0
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 0
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 0
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
  • ratingsId - 1794661980252606933E19DC08B3C88EB563D16CB538874F1AE7AEFEA0A83A02316818E21DAC25058D6