Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2024-05-26 09:15:09 UTC - NOT_HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: 5A102069B82C54B946EA9CCC0E09EF7CB77DD19322D905BED66A7586BF605CEB
Participant Details

Original Note:

1. Der zitierte Post, den jeder mit dem Repost liest, kann denknotwendig kein fehlender wichtiger Kontext des zitierenden Posts sein. 2. Klöckner interpretiert, was sie zitiert. Das ist Meinung. Vorgeschlagene CN entbehrlich. Ihre Überlegung mag als Kommentar vorgestellt werden.

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1794636054252699860
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - 5A102069B82C54B946EA9CCC0E09EF7CB77DD19322D905BED66A7586BF605CEB
  • createdAtMillis - 1716714909083
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - NOT_HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 0
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 0
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 0
  • helpfulImportantContext - 0
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 0
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 1
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 1
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 1
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
  • ratingsId - 17946360542526998605A102069B82C54B946EA9CCC0E09EF7CB77DD19322D905BED66A7586BF605CEB