Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2024-05-26 08:13:15 UTC - HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: 59AECF8AC213A86EE9AA5FD7B64CFD1AE717FA18E9FE4822489FFCD2702D99A7
Participant Details

Original Note:

1. Der zitierte Post, den jeder mit dem Repost liest, kann denknotwendig kein fehlender wichtiger Kontext des zitierenden Posts sein. 2. Klöckner interpretiert, was sie zitiert. Das ist Meinung. Vorgeschlagene CN entbehrlich. Ihre Überlegung mag als Kommentar vorgestellt werden.

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1794636054252699860
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - 59AECF8AC213A86EE9AA5FD7B64CFD1AE717FA18E9FE4822489FFCD2702D99A7
  • createdAtMillis - 1716711195832
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 1
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 0
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 0
  • helpfulImportantContext - 1
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 0
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 0
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 0
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 0
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
  • ratingsId - 179463605425269986059AECF8AC213A86EE9AA5FD7B64CFD1AE717FA18E9FE4822489FFCD2702D99A7