Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2024-05-26 07:57:08 UTC - NOT_HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: 27A641D155E1CDE86D13F9E86205565BF7BC416B5FE56CF5F4EDF16D8F04DC23
Participant Details

Original Note:

1. Der zitierte Post, den jeder mit dem Repost liest, kann denknotwendig kein fehlender wichtiger Kontext des zitierenden Posts sein. 2. Klöckner interpretiert, was sie zitiert. Das ist Meinung. Vorgeschlagene CN entbehrlich. Ihre Überlegung mag als Kommentar vorgestellt werden.

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1794636054252699860
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - 27A641D155E1CDE86D13F9E86205565BF7BC416B5FE56CF5F4EDF16D8F04DC23
  • createdAtMillis - 1716710228436
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - NOT_HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 0
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 0
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 0
  • helpfulImportantContext - 0
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 0
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 1
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 1
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 0
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 1
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 0
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
  • ratingsId - 179463605425269986027A641D155E1CDE86D13F9E86205565BF7BC416B5FE56CF5F4EDF16D8F04DC23