Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2024-05-26 06:37:50 UTC - NOT_HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: 780066030D8F4190F611D1AFB1030C29D0AD9B5564B6AA7DE6422CADCE23A364
Participant Details

Original Note:

The proposed note is pedantic (and therefore not needed), and is also wrong. The decay value is not "the time it takes half a mass [...] to decay". It is a statistical value, the accuracy of which depends on the mass - ie, the deviation is asymptotic to zero with increasing mass.

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1794589516264878158
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - 780066030D8F4190F611D1AFB1030C29D0AD9B5564B6AA7DE6422CADCE23A364
  • createdAtMillis - 1716705470151
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - NOT_HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 0
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 0
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 0
  • helpfulImportantContext - 0
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 0
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 1
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 1
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 0
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 0
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
  • ratingsId - 1794589516264878158780066030D8F4190F611D1AFB1030C29D0AD9B5564B6AA7DE6422CADCE23A364