Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2024-05-27 12:39:06 UTC - NOT_HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: 44AA956C80610B05EDEA00DBE14E3B24112D16C1E42B49DC0D8221A83D915854
Participant Details

Original Note:

The proposed note is pedantic (and therefore not needed), and is also wrong. The decay value is not "the time it takes half a mass [...] to decay". It is a statistical value, the accuracy of which depends on the mass - ie, the deviation is asymptotic to zero with increasing mass.

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1794589516264878158
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - 44AA956C80610B05EDEA00DBE14E3B24112D16C1E42B49DC0D8221A83D915854
  • createdAtMillis - 1716813546790
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - NOT_HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 0
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 0
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 0
  • helpfulImportantContext - 0
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 0
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 1
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 1
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 1
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 0
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
  • ratingsId - 179458951626487815844AA956C80610B05EDEA00DBE14E3B24112D16C1E42B49DC0D8221A83D915854