Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2024-05-26 18:36:49 UTC - NOT_HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: 9FFACE6019CA949DE986A48DFF673B4E10B008A86B1424BA2BE602432BBAA69D
Participant Details

Original Note:

A autora do post citado não o vinculou à sua prática como estudante de Psicologia, se tratando de uma opinião pessoal. Generalizações como esta podem levar a um entendimento equivocado de uma categoria profissional. https://atosoficiais.com.br/cfp/resolucao-do-exercicio-profissional-n-10-2005-aprova-o-codigo-de-etica-profissional-do-psicologo?origin=instituicao

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1794579793389760766
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - 9FFACE6019CA949DE986A48DFF673B4E10B008A86B1424BA2BE602432BBAA69D
  • createdAtMillis - 1716748609364
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - NOT_HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 0
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 0
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 0
  • helpfulImportantContext - 0
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 0
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 0
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 0
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 1
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 1
  • ratingsId - 17945797933897607669FFACE6019CA949DE986A48DFF673B4E10B008A86B1424BA2BE602432BBAA69D