Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2024-05-25 21:23:49 UTC - NOT_HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: F76384D785CE0B562E45792D0368DA1AA44EE585029F4F6E5C3064774A45D7C4
Participant Details

Original Note:

Note may be needed, none of those currently proposed are acceptable as they are all based on speculation and probability, none of which are objective grounds for fact. Sort it out in the comments, you’ll reach more people anyways. That’s how x.com works.

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1794467269545955656
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - F76384D785CE0B562E45792D0368DA1AA44EE585029F4F6E5C3064774A45D7C4
  • createdAtMillis - 1716672229428
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - NOT_HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 0
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 0
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 0
  • helpfulImportantContext - 0
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 0
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 0
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 0
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 0
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
  • ratingsId - 1794467269545955656F76384D785CE0B562E45792D0368DA1AA44EE585029F4F6E5C3064774A45D7C4