Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2024-05-26 09:29:55 UTC - NOT_HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: A086E1135345BA0CA4A3419BC14CC0F0A1D813EA3E6BBFEC29248F91965EC90F
Participant Details

Original Note:

Note may be needed, none of those currently proposed are acceptable as they are all based on speculation and probability, none of which are objective grounds for fact. Sort it out in the comments, you’ll reach more people anyways. That’s how x.com works.

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1794467269545955656
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - A086E1135345BA0CA4A3419BC14CC0F0A1D813EA3E6BBFEC29248F91965EC90F
  • createdAtMillis - 1716715795583
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - NOT_HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 0
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 0
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 0
  • helpfulImportantContext - 0
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 0
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 1
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 1
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 0
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 1
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 0
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 1
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 1
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
  • ratingsId - 1794467269545955656A086E1135345BA0CA4A3419BC14CC0F0A1D813EA3E6BBFEC29248F91965EC90F