Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2024-05-26 04:18:17 UTC - NOT_HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: 59CCDF43252F9A3DE44401AE37AC9E2B7FEF265C635CF5040A329FA84BCC9A5C
Participant Details

Original Note:

Note may be needed, none of those currently proposed are acceptable as they are all based on speculation and probability, none of which are objective grounds for fact. Sort it out in the comments, you’ll reach more people anyways. That’s how x.com works.

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1794467269545955656
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - 59CCDF43252F9A3DE44401AE37AC9E2B7FEF265C635CF5040A329FA84BCC9A5C
  • createdAtMillis - 1716697097234
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - NOT_HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 0
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 0
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 0
  • helpfulImportantContext - 0
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 0
  • notHelpfulOther - 1
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 1
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 0
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 0
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
  • ratingsId - 179446726954595565659CCDF43252F9A3DE44401AE37AC9E2B7FEF265C635CF5040A329FA84BCC9A5C