Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2024-05-25 20:48:13 UTC - NOT_HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: 409656ADA8B83A56D54E797B1E21975964F30CB5EBFC884CB536412C9F5C8BA9
Participant Details

Original Note:

Note may be needed, none of those currently proposed are acceptable as they are all based on speculation and probability, none of which are objective grounds for fact. Sort it out in the comments, you’ll reach more people anyways. That’s how x.com works.

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1794467269545955656
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - 409656ADA8B83A56D54E797B1E21975964F30CB5EBFC884CB536412C9F5C8BA9
  • createdAtMillis - 1716670093394
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - NOT_HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 0
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 0
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 0
  • helpfulImportantContext - 0
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 0
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 0
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 0
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 0
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
  • ratingsId - 1794467269545955656409656ADA8B83A56D54E797B1E21975964F30CB5EBFC884CB536412C9F5C8BA9