Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2024-05-26 08:11:08 UTC - NOT_HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: 2587C67C8C6C5B4503795A87C79F2D03DA8E6198FC7FEDBC103009C2E4ECAFA0
Participant Details

Original Note:

Note may be needed, none of those currently proposed are acceptable as they are all based on speculation and probability, none of which are objective grounds for fact. Sort it out in the comments, you’ll reach more people anyways. That’s how x.com works.

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1794467269545955656
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - 2587C67C8C6C5B4503795A87C79F2D03DA8E6198FC7FEDBC103009C2E4ECAFA0
  • createdAtMillis - 1716711068007
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - NOT_HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 0
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 0
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 0
  • helpfulImportantContext - 0
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 0
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 0
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 0
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 0
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
  • ratingsId - 17944672695459556562587C67C8C6C5B4503795A87C79F2D03DA8E6198FC7FEDBC103009C2E4ECAFA0