Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2024-05-26 10:19:34 UTC - NOT_HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: BA86A805A947F850FE9F246C214AE5E3E4936FED571438C03F0293B74DF39EF0
Participant Details

Original Note:

NNN. The post does not pretend to share a "scientific poll." Academic definitions of "data analysis" generally include electoral projections based on election results or polling data such as the one above. Methodological criticisms should take place in the comment section.

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1794451985481031988
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - BA86A805A947F850FE9F246C214AE5E3E4936FED571438C03F0293B74DF39EF0
  • createdAtMillis - 1716718774758
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - NOT_HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 0
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 0
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 0
  • helpfulImportantContext - 0
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 0
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 1
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 0
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 0
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
  • ratingsId - 1794451985481031988BA86A805A947F850FE9F246C214AE5E3E4936FED571438C03F0293B74DF39EF0