Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2024-05-26 01:26:55 UTC - HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: 53F25C223C552C2ED465CD99E23320D809ED07E57CF96D34AB8055DD6D74F902
Participant Details

Original Note:

NNN. The post does not pretend to share a "scientific poll." Academic definitions of "data analysis" generally include electoral projections based on election results or polling data such as the one above. Methodological criticisms should take place in the comment section.

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1794451985481031988
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - 53F25C223C552C2ED465CD99E23320D809ED07E57CF96D34AB8055DD6D74F902
  • createdAtMillis - 1716686815052
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 1
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 0
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 1
  • helpfulImportantContext - 1
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 1
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 0
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 0
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 0
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
  • ratingsId - 179445198548103198853F25C223C552C2ED465CD99E23320D809ED07E57CF96D34AB8055DD6D74F902