Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2024-05-25 21:35:27 UTC - NOT_HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: C16B5F4251D71B52565E66653A10727475AE01FE2EC63C550E21C4A02BFB1804
Participant Details

Original Note:

NNN - The article is an opinion piece and not claiming to be factual Furthermore, as of writing this, the proposed note is not only highly opinionated but directly plagiarised from another user's tweet. https://twitter.com/disappoptimism/status/1794326062975139898

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1794427298499699181
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - C16B5F4251D71B52565E66653A10727475AE01FE2EC63C550E21C4A02BFB1804
  • createdAtMillis - 1716672927519
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - NOT_HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 0
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 0
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 0
  • helpfulImportantContext - 0
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 0
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 1
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 0
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 0
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
  • ratingsId - 1794427298499699181C16B5F4251D71B52565E66653A10727475AE01FE2EC63C550E21C4A02BFB1804