Birdwatch Archive - Rating Details

Birdwatch Note Rating

2024-05-25 23:51:27 UTC - HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: EB8F8D0DC6CC540989EAB0E5E74EC79AEE645FFFEE6318E1397583FE438772F3
Participant Details

Original Note:

NNN. Der Dienstleister der Software hat dies bestätigt. Zudem sind die Community Notes spekulativ, da sie ebenfalls das Gegenteilige nicht beweisen können. Somit sind sie nicht gerechtfertigt. https://www.bild.de/politik/inland/86-prozent-gegen-parteiforderung-cdu-abstimmung-zum-verbrenner-verbot-manipuliert-66517e75bade7176939c3f26

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

noteId - 1794380637480104031
participantId -
raterParticipantId - EB8F8D0DC6CC540989EAB0E5E74EC79AEE645FFFEE6318E1397583FE438772F3
createdAtMillis - 1716681087910
version - 2
agree - 0
disagree - 0
helpful - 0
notHelpful - 0
helpfulnessLevel - HELPFUL
helpfulOther - 0
helpfulInformative - 0
helpfulClear - 1
helpfulEmpathetic - 0
helpfulGoodSources - 0
helpfulUniqueContext - 0
helpfulAddressesClaim - 0
helpfulImportantContext - 0
helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 0
notHelpfulOther - 0
notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 0
notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 0
notHelpfulOutdated - 0
notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 0
notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 0
notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
ratingsId - 1794380637480104031EB8F8D0DC6CC540989EAB0E5E74EC79AEE645FFFEE6318E1397583FE438772F3