Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2024-05-25 09:45:02 UTC - NOT_HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: FB3FF6901108B0C76494E2C7A760CFA0DD98566A3648B24708BD37598F97F67C
Participant Details

Original Note:

NNN. You cannot prove a negative. It is impossible to prove, no DNA contamination & study shows some. Discussions on theories & studies are comments. Null hypothesis proves nada. Learn logic. https://www.cambridge.org/core/services/aop-cambridge-core/content/view/0BBE48877743A318F2B9CE24F873904C/S1477175600001287a.pdf/thinking-tools-you-can-prove-a-negative.pdf

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1794300523929288997
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - FB3FF6901108B0C76494E2C7A760CFA0DD98566A3648B24708BD37598F97F67C
  • createdAtMillis - 1716630302348
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - NOT_HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 0
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 0
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 0
  • helpfulImportantContext - 0
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 0
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 1
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 0
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 1
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
  • ratingsId - 1794300523929288997FB3FF6901108B0C76494E2C7A760CFA0DD98566A3648B24708BD37598F97F67C