Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2024-05-25 17:58:24 UTC - HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: 6291AC42BA040F12A07C585DB5BF3CA0412A8160FA780A37C4573E5DD19BB1B1
Participant Details

Original Note:

Although he is using sarcastic language, There is no evidence at all that the UK judiciary are "institutionally corrupt" Laurence infact had hearings in regards to deformation that he has lost - both for and against him https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/entertainment-arts-68899248 https://www.standard.co.uk/news/crime/laurence-fox-fox-justice-high-court-london-b1136112.html

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1794146851484029333
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - 6291AC42BA040F12A07C585DB5BF3CA0412A8160FA780A37C4573E5DD19BB1B1
  • createdAtMillis - 1716659904149
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 1
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 1
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 1
  • helpfulImportantContext - 1
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 1
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 0
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 0
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 0
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
  • ratingsId - 17941468514840293336291AC42BA040F12A07C585DB5BF3CA0412A8160FA780A37C4573E5DD19BB1B1