Birdwatch Archive - Rating Details

Birdwatch Note Rating

2024-05-25 12:20:37 UTC - NOT_HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: 555E61B89D2AC2134EEEF667845767354A24EB019E10D1398347CBB4CB4A0567
Participant Details

Original Note:

Although he is using sarcastic language, There is no evidence at all that the UK judiciary are "institutionally corrupt" Laurence infact had hearings in regards to deformation that he has lost - both for and against him https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/entertainment-arts-68899248 https://www.standard.co.uk/news/crime/laurence-fox-fox-justice-high-court-london-b1136112.html

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

noteId - 1794146851484029333
participantId -
raterParticipantId - 555E61B89D2AC2134EEEF667845767354A24EB019E10D1398347CBB4CB4A0567
createdAtMillis - 1716639637022
version - 2
agree - 0
disagree - 0
helpful - 0
notHelpful - 0
helpfulnessLevel - NOT_HELPFUL
helpfulOther - 0
helpfulInformative - 0
helpfulClear - 0
helpfulEmpathetic - 0
helpfulGoodSources - 0
helpfulUniqueContext - 0
helpfulAddressesClaim - 0
helpfulImportantContext - 0
helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 0
notHelpfulOther - 0
notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 0
notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 0
notHelpfulOutdated - 0
notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 1
notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 1
notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 1
ratingsId - 1794146851484029333555E61B89D2AC2134EEEF667845767354A24EB019E10D1398347CBB4CB4A0567