Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2024-05-25 00:05:03 UTC - HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: C5E7B9E82CE416C495518A835D3DD1051D18AEA90B9FD0722BF3C1660850E260
Participant Details

Original Note:

The article claim misleads by mixing EPA theoretical methodology range for the starting point, and actual user range for the three year point. Most of the difference is simply the difference between EPA methodology and actual driving conditions, not degradation. https://x.com/MartinViecha/status/1794058136640450815

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1794072833963778212
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - C5E7B9E82CE416C495518A835D3DD1051D18AEA90B9FD0722BF3C1660850E260
  • createdAtMillis - 1716595503737
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 1
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 1
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 1
  • helpfulImportantContext - 1
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 1
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 0
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 0
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 0
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
  • ratingsId - 1794072833963778212C5E7B9E82CE416C495518A835D3DD1051D18AEA90B9FD0722BF3C1660850E260