Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2024-05-27 03:21:52 UTC - HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: ACA0D6D6D492747DBA57A254B67B0681A1FA4F7D955C3FB55863983A25CF2DC9
Participant Details

Original Note:

The article claim misleads by mixing EPA theoretical methodology range for the starting point, and actual user range for the three year point. Most of the difference is simply the difference between EPA methodology and actual driving conditions, not degradation. https://x.com/MartinViecha/status/1794058136640450815

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1794072833963778212
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - ACA0D6D6D492747DBA57A254B67B0681A1FA4F7D955C3FB55863983A25CF2DC9
  • createdAtMillis - 1716780112940
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 1
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 0
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 1
  • helpfulImportantContext - 1
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 1
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 0
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 0
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 0
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
  • ratingsId - 1794072833963778212ACA0D6D6D492747DBA57A254B67B0681A1FA4F7D955C3FB55863983A25CF2DC9