Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2024-05-26 06:58:27 UTC - HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: 0557F8193C3CA63B690EA2374C7A39B1B1DF79FB68A0D02D6F1980A4940CF11F
Participant Details

Original Note:

The article claim misleads by mixing EPA theoretical methodology range for the starting point, and actual user range for the three year point. Most of the difference is simply the difference between EPA methodology and actual driving conditions, not degradation. https://x.com/MartinViecha/status/1794058136640450815

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1794072833963778212
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - 0557F8193C3CA63B690EA2374C7A39B1B1DF79FB68A0D02D6F1980A4940CF11F
  • createdAtMillis - 1716706707047
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 1
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 0
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 1
  • helpfulImportantContext - 1
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 0
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 0
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 0
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 0
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
  • ratingsId - 17940728339637782120557F8193C3CA63B690EA2374C7A39B1B1DF79FB68A0D02D6F1980A4940CF11F