Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2024-05-24 19:08:41 UTC - NOT_HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: ABCAEC7584C860170D93DC9A68FA209647A7993726F6821DBE954BD297297994
Participant Details

Original Note:

This is an example of the ecological fallacy, where characteristics of a subgroup (judges) are wrongly inferred from a larger group (all Americans), leading to misleading conclusions. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ecological_fallacy

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1793741917630452001
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - ABCAEC7584C860170D93DC9A68FA209647A7993726F6821DBE954BD297297994
  • createdAtMillis - 1716577721420
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - NOT_HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 0
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 0
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 0
  • helpfulImportantContext - 0
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 0
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 1
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 1
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 1
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 0
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 1
  • ratingsId - 1793741917630452001ABCAEC7584C860170D93DC9A68FA209647A7993726F6821DBE954BD297297994