Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2024-05-24 18:43:30 UTC - HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: CD57A5FE2B40692FDAD4B6F7B35CEC036B0196F4A3D4E5D2E9D587C8680EE771
Participant Details

Original Note:

NNN. Post diz que pesquisa registrou 87% de 'aprovação', o que não pode ser dado como verdade ou mentira. Isto porque, a pesquisa Quaest é qualitativa e não pergunta necessariamente se 'APROVA' ou 'REPROVA'. https://delighted.com/pt-br/blog/qualitative-vs-quantitative-research

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1793642797645414797
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - CD57A5FE2B40692FDAD4B6F7B35CEC036B0196F4A3D4E5D2E9D587C8680EE771
  • createdAtMillis - 1716576210734
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 1
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 0
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 0
  • helpfulImportantContext - 0
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 0
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 0
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 0
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 0
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
  • ratingsId - 1793642797645414797CD57A5FE2B40692FDAD4B6F7B35CEC036B0196F4A3D4E5D2E9D587C8680EE771