Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2024-05-26 20:37:43 UTC - HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: 86D1F0ACFE0AD9D8DA303CF28D36D309CD4D63B6624FDCC6C5CB2FF3B91842C6
Participant Details

Original Note:

The currently shown note use a study as reference that has been retracted due to errors in methodology and statistical evidence that the conclusion was incorrect. https://ajp.psychiatryonline.org/doi/10.1176/appi.ajp.2020.20060803

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1793587375546761479
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - 86D1F0ACFE0AD9D8DA303CF28D36D309CD4D63B6624FDCC6C5CB2FF3B91842C6
  • createdAtMillis - 1716755863696
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 0
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 0
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 0
  • helpfulImportantContext - 0
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 0
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 0
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 0
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 0
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
  • ratingsId - 179358737554676147986D1F0ACFE0AD9D8DA303CF28D36D309CD4D63B6624FDCC6C5CB2FF3B91842C6