Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2024-05-23 02:02:43 UTC - HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: F1D302B258E6891B6773C0F3F955D25836EA76E9B4BBCF4526D137FB5CED322B
Participant Details

Original Note:

This behavior is widely acknowledged as lying. The original post gives no indication that the scenario is "hypothetical" or purely illustrative. It fits the APA definition for disinformation: https://www.apa.org/topics/journalism-facts/misinformation-disinformation

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1793385238271250836
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - F1D302B258E6891B6773C0F3F955D25836EA76E9B4BBCF4526D137FB5CED322B
  • createdAtMillis - 1716429763510
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 0
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 1
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 1
  • helpfulImportantContext - 0
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 0
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 0
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 0
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 0
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
  • ratingsId - 1793385238271250836F1D302B258E6891B6773C0F3F955D25836EA76E9B4BBCF4526D137FB5CED322B