Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2024-05-22 21:02:21 UTC - HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: 26C015A7417BBE3A35BCEDF7C2F4330701B85560150B085A006B87B8FB513FEA
Participant Details

Original Note:

This behavior is widely acknowledged as lying. The original post gives no indication that the scenario is "hypothetical" or purely illustrative. It fits the APA definition for disinformation: https://www.apa.org/topics/journalism-facts/misinformation-disinformation

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1793385238271250836
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - 26C015A7417BBE3A35BCEDF7C2F4330701B85560150B085A006B87B8FB513FEA
  • createdAtMillis - 1716411741426
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 1
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 1
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 1
  • helpfulImportantContext - 1
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 1
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 0
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 0
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 0
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
  • ratingsId - 179338523827125083626C015A7417BBE3A35BCEDF7C2F4330701B85560150B085A006B87B8FB513FEA