Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2024-05-23 05:38:40 UTC - NOT_HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: D4B955D2C969848272ADF74266288665E9F274DD3B33EBC57CEEBF5E2E31C6FC
Participant Details

Original Note:

La interpretación de hechos públicos es parte del debate politico, incluso en X. Lo correcto es debatir acerca de la interpretación de hechos como este y no generar notas innecesarias. https://agendapublica.es/noticia/13802/twitter-espacio-transformacion-debate-politico

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1793310947093668003
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - D4B955D2C969848272ADF74266288665E9F274DD3B33EBC57CEEBF5E2E31C6FC
  • createdAtMillis - 1716442720393
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - NOT_HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 0
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 0
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 0
  • helpfulImportantContext - 0
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 0
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 1
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 1
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 1
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 0
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
  • ratingsId - 1793310947093668003D4B955D2C969848272ADF74266288665E9F274DD3B33EBC57CEEBF5E2E31C6FC