Birdwatch Note Rating
2024-05-22 12:31:23 UTC - HELPFUL
Rated by Participant: DF2B22A9DA2C3A73D536D75BD93760D247D02DB7CBD74B845ADB10DF8943DCBD
Participant Details
Original Note:
The tribunal in Adams v ERCC heard evidence from the centre’s employees that they did not receive threats or need to lock down. They also heard ERCC prioritised the CEO’s wishes over rape survivors’, turned away those who did not conform & refused to refer to other services. https://tribunaltweets.substack.com/p/adams-vs-edinburgh-rape-crisis-centre?r=1gxdhb&utm_campaign=post&utm_medium=web&triedRedirect=true
All Note Details