Birdwatch Note Rating
2024-05-22 10:54:07 UTC - HELPFUL
Rated by Participant: 81315FA84D59AC7F54EA86FECA1BAD2571E462A852B80108E70A58CF36CAEFB5
Participant Details
Original Note:
The tribunal in Adams v ERCC heard evidence from the centre’s employees that they did not receive threats or need to lock down. They also heard ERCC prioritised the CEO’s wishes over rape survivors’, turned away those who did not conform & refused to refer to other services. https://tribunaltweets.substack.com/p/adams-vs-edinburgh-rape-crisis-centre?r=1gxdhb&utm_campaign=post&utm_medium=web&triedRedirect=true
All Note Details