Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2024-05-22 10:43:12 UTC - HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: 7D30FE65FF5105216676FF39603DFFEFCDB44609E8EA62DE91CD6970755F1CB6
Participant Details

Original Note:

The tribunal in Adams v ERCC heard evidence from the centre’s employees that they did not receive threats or need to lock down. They also heard ERCC prioritised the CEO’s wishes over rape survivors’, turned away those who did not conform & refused to refer to other services. https://tribunaltweets.substack.com/p/adams-vs-edinburgh-rape-crisis-centre?r=1gxdhb&utm_campaign=post&utm_medium=web&triedRedirect=true

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1793205623644905547
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - 7D30FE65FF5105216676FF39603DFFEFCDB44609E8EA62DE91CD6970755F1CB6
  • createdAtMillis - 1716374592049
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 1
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 1
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 1
  • helpfulImportantContext - 1
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 0
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 0
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 0
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 0
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
  • ratingsId - 17932056236449055477D30FE65FF5105216676FF39603DFFEFCDB44609E8EA62DE91CD6970755F1CB6