Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2024-05-22 23:26:41 UTC - HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: 9C3B6067F2E5F1A464286D977BD55FB8E48FC0C62871D353901ABD4E789B16BA
Participant Details

Original Note:

While the methodology is sound, such a few number of samples which were all locally sourced is not valid for the generalisations the study is attempting to assert. While there is the possibility their findings are correct this study should not be treated as proof of theory. https://hsc.unm.edu/news/2024/05/hsc-newsroom-post-microplastics-testicular.html

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1793174521790316614
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - 9C3B6067F2E5F1A464286D977BD55FB8E48FC0C62871D353901ABD4E789B16BA
  • createdAtMillis - 1716420401720
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 1
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 0
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 0
  • helpfulImportantContext - 0
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 0
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 0
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 0
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 0
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
  • ratingsId - 17931745217903166149C3B6067F2E5F1A464286D977BD55FB8E48FC0C62871D353901ABD4E789B16BA