Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2024-05-22 04:30:48 UTC - HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: 42ED1B8F00152CE4094BE83F962FF4658680A0E34A5B3DA2D7AB2E22AA2496A4
Participant Details

Original Note:

NNN - it doesn't matter which exact model was used. It is still a model trained by OpenAI. The claim in the tweet correctly states the results of the study that was conducted.

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1793129903367266748
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - 42ED1B8F00152CE4094BE83F962FF4658680A0E34A5B3DA2D7AB2E22AA2496A4
  • createdAtMillis - 1716352248769
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 0
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 0
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 1
  • helpfulImportantContext - 0
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 0
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 0
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 0
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 0
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
  • ratingsId - 179312990336726674842ED1B8F00152CE4094BE83F962FF4658680A0E34A5B3DA2D7AB2E22AA2496A4