Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2024-05-22 10:15:52 UTC - NOT_HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: 11F9D7BAC4402CD153D41AC9439BE16A298D5EFD8C973C76B05D1806F2D3A771
Participant Details

Original Note:

O post induz o leitor a crer que a pena de José Dirceu teria sido encerrada, quando na verdade o STF entendeu que a denúncia foi recebida quando a punição já estava prescrita. Não houve julgamento do mérito, sendo indevido o juízo de inocência do beneficiado. https://portal.stf.jus.br/noticias/verNoticiaDetalhe.asp?idConteudo=538777&ori=1

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1793080972872749358
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - 11F9D7BAC4402CD153D41AC9439BE16A298D5EFD8C973C76B05D1806F2D3A771
  • createdAtMillis - 1716372952882
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - NOT_HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 0
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 0
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 0
  • helpfulImportantContext - 0
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 0
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 1
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 0
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 1
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 1
  • ratingsId - 179308097287274935811F9D7BAC4402CD153D41AC9439BE16A298D5EFD8C973C76B05D1806F2D3A771