Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2024-05-22 08:49:20 UTC - HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: F0B60FBCE9EEDA1674DA5C0E5C02998C8A0A51DA432A5D39FA384665162531FD
Participant Details

Original Note:

This is false, as it factors in learning consumption for ChatGPT but not crawling consumption for Google. Without the learning component factored in ChatGPT consumes 0.003-0.004 Wh per query and is thus 10 times more energy efficient than a Google search. https://www.trgdatacenters.com/resource/ai-chatbots-energy-usage-of-2023s-most-popular-chatbots-so-far/

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1792930957294477695
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - F0B60FBCE9EEDA1674DA5C0E5C02998C8A0A51DA432A5D39FA384665162531FD
  • createdAtMillis - 1716367760704
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 0
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 0
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 0
  • helpfulImportantContext - 1
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 0
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 0
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 0
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 0
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
  • ratingsId - 1792930957294477695F0B60FBCE9EEDA1674DA5C0E5C02998C8A0A51DA432A5D39FA384665162531FD