Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2024-05-21 10:18:01 UTC - NOT_HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: 656F03E439E72AB233AAE166F344B5C4FD546DCCFAF297DB806CC642A688D190
Participant Details

Original Note:

A note is most likely needed, however the above note lists two unreliable sources with Tagesschau being the only reliable source. A new note is probably warranted with the unreliable sources removed and additional sources added that are trustworthy. https://adfontesmedia.com/national-review-bias-and-reliability/ https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Daily_Star_(United_Kingdom) https://mediabiasfactcheck.com/tagesschau-bias/

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1792780483568238894
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - 656F03E439E72AB233AAE166F344B5C4FD546DCCFAF297DB806CC642A688D190
  • createdAtMillis - 1716286681042
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - NOT_HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 0
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 0
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 0
  • helpfulImportantContext - 0
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 0
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 0
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 0
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 1
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 1
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
  • ratingsId - 1792780483568238894656F03E439E72AB233AAE166F344B5C4FD546DCCFAF297DB806CC642A688D190