Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2024-05-21 13:50:05 UTC - NOT_HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: 87A83D5F97821E7E9EBB353F10911FBC907B083E34BFE4B6644C64452E4DD75D
Participant Details

Original Note:

OP incorrectly cites anti-abortion laws as the hospitals’ basis for refusing to treat his wife’s miscarriage. Texas law clearly exempts the removal of a dead, unborn child as abortion. https://statutes.capitol.texas.gov/Docs/HS/htm/HS.245.htm Women in similar cases were told that the provider was liable for medical malpractice. https://www.liveaction.org/news/texas-abortion-plaintiffs-suing-doctors-ag/

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1792737199865364982
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - 87A83D5F97821E7E9EBB353F10911FBC907B083E34BFE4B6644C64452E4DD75D
  • createdAtMillis - 1716299405463
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - NOT_HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 0
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 0
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 0
  • helpfulImportantContext - 0
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 0
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 1
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 1
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 0
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 1
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 1
  • ratingsId - 179273719986536498287A83D5F97821E7E9EBB353F10911FBC907B083E34BFE4B6644C64452E4DD75D