Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2024-05-22 14:39:12 UTC - HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: 49DA124B24E2B452BF4E1D20CF79FD0E3BC4ECB3CC84C19F41E38F1B519B6C6E
Participant Details

Original Note:

OP incorrectly cites anti-abortion laws as the hospitals’ basis for refusing to treat his wife’s miscarriage. Texas law clearly exempts the removal of a dead, unborn child as abortion. https://statutes.capitol.texas.gov/Docs/HS/htm/HS.245.htm Women in similar cases were told that the provider was liable for medical malpractice. https://www.liveaction.org/news/texas-abortion-plaintiffs-suing-doctors-ag/

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1792737199865364982
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - 49DA124B24E2B452BF4E1D20CF79FD0E3BC4ECB3CC84C19F41E38F1B519B6C6E
  • createdAtMillis - 1716388752075
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 1
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 1
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 1
  • helpfulImportantContext - 1
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 0
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 0
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 0
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 0
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
  • ratingsId - 179273719986536498249DA124B24E2B452BF4E1D20CF79FD0E3BC4ECB3CC84C19F41E38F1B519B6C6E