Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2024-05-20 17:30:09 UTC - HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: 5803BE12E943F360F3E4D9F71560F7EAC7C3B07A03BE7562304C4F1C1CA60856
Participant Details

Original Note:

Ofcom ruled on the fact that his answers and criticism of Labour policies were unchallenged by both the audience and the presenter in any meaningful way. Which did not follow Ofcom's rules of due impartiality in allowing the other side a fair chance to answer. https://www.ofcom.org.uk/news-centre/2024/gb-news-could-face-sanction-after-breaking-due-impartiality-rules

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1792579915012870296
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - 5803BE12E943F360F3E4D9F71560F7EAC7C3B07A03BE7562304C4F1C1CA60856
  • createdAtMillis - 1716226209560
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 1
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 1
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 1
  • helpfulImportantContext - 1
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 1
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 0
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 0
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 0
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
  • ratingsId - 17925799150128702965803BE12E943F360F3E4D9F71560F7EAC7C3B07A03BE7562304C4F1C1CA60856