Birdwatch Archive - Rating Details

Birdwatch Note Rating

2024-05-20 11:33:59 UTC - HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: 9DFEF7E8940ED51EDA8ABEBB9007AACDFF4BCA59ECA961AB8D9254168CCEA537
Participant Details

Original Note:

This is not true. The SPHPL article, using data from research in the NEJM, contained an error in its calculations. It was withdrawn soon after this fact check was published. https://fullfact.org/health/expose-miscarriage-nejm/ https://cf5e727d-d02d-4d71-89ff-9fe2d3ad957f.filesusr.com/ugd/adf864_ed413dccc2b5463dae23025690855524.pdf

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

noteId - 1792514869322797087
participantId -
raterParticipantId - 9DFEF7E8940ED51EDA8ABEBB9007AACDFF4BCA59ECA961AB8D9254168CCEA537
createdAtMillis - 1716204839711
version - 2
agree - 0
disagree - 0
helpful - 0
notHelpful - 0
helpfulnessLevel - HELPFUL
helpfulOther - 0
helpfulInformative - 0
helpfulClear - 1
helpfulEmpathetic - 0
helpfulGoodSources - 1
helpfulUniqueContext - 0
helpfulAddressesClaim - 0
helpfulImportantContext - 0
helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 0
notHelpfulOther - 0
notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 0
notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 0
notHelpfulOutdated - 0
notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 0
notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 0
notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
ratingsId - 17925148693227970879DFEF7E8940ED51EDA8ABEBB9007AACDFF4BCA59ECA961AB8D9254168CCEA537