Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2024-05-19 18:19:53 UTC - SOMEWHAT_HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: 57929FD996152CA0EE5E7EB92B1886C6D75A080B72B45D2DCBA01C75CFC37D11
Participant Details

Original Note:

The note above claims one person was waved into the Capitol. In the article cited however, the court did *not* find that he was waved in, but that it was ambiguous. Since the prosecution could not prove *beyond a reasonable doubt* he wasn’t waved in, he was acquitted.

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1792200796869885952
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - 57929FD996152CA0EE5E7EB92B1886C6D75A080B72B45D2DCBA01C75CFC37D11
  • createdAtMillis - 1716142793293
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - SOMEWHAT_HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 1
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 0
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 0
  • helpfulImportantContext - 0
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 0
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 1
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 0
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 0
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 0
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
  • ratingsId - 179220079686988595257929FD996152CA0EE5E7EB92B1886C6D75A080B72B45D2DCBA01C75CFC37D11