Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2024-05-19 17:21:11 UTC - HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: 162AA6EE9EC38C2B307752E2A5D9F4677C42BC9D6D0D68D846508C9FF8AABC9F
Participant Details

Original Note:

The CN about Matthew Martin is misleading. Martin was acquitted in April 2022 because a judge believed that Martin THOUGHT he was allowed to enter the Capitol, not that he was actually "let in." To date, Martin is the only defendant to successfully argue this. Court transcript: https://storage.courtlistener.com/recap/gov.uscourts.dcd.232204/gov.uscourts.dcd.232204.43.0.pdf

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1792200341502513154
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - 162AA6EE9EC38C2B307752E2A5D9F4677C42BC9D6D0D68D846508C9FF8AABC9F
  • createdAtMillis - 1716139271897
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 1
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 1
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 1
  • helpfulImportantContext - 1
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 1
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 0
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 0
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 0
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
  • ratingsId - 1792200341502513154162AA6EE9EC38C2B307752E2A5D9F4677C42BC9D6D0D68D846508C9FF8AABC9F