Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2024-05-19 16:45:01 UTC - NOT_HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: 885889990B9876213D11C564DA9E64D0860D7AD185B4D3E700E52A574F5333A4
Participant Details

Original Note:

The year in which the scandal occurred is not relevant. Suggested note therefore does not provide important added context. Such responses that nitpick details are better suited for in the comments.

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1792159537295741225
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - 885889990B9876213D11C564DA9E64D0860D7AD185B4D3E700E52A574F5333A4
  • createdAtMillis - 1716137101679
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - NOT_HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 0
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 0
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 0
  • helpfulImportantContext - 0
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 0
  • notHelpfulOther - 1
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 0
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 0
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 0
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
  • ratingsId - 1792159537295741225885889990B9876213D11C564DA9E64D0860D7AD185B4D3E700E52A574F5333A4