Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2024-05-19 12:28:22 UTC - NOT_HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: 57719154C64DE97D9AB4C1232865CD08D5EC78D861683CF7DEAE90E1B1F69AAC
Participant Details

Original Note:

The year in which the scandal occurred is not relevant. Suggested note therefore does not provide important added context. Such responses that nitpick details are better suited for in the comments.

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1792159537295741225
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - 57719154C64DE97D9AB4C1232865CD08D5EC78D861683CF7DEAE90E1B1F69AAC
  • createdAtMillis - 1716121702652
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - NOT_HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 0
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 0
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 0
  • helpfulImportantContext - 0
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 0
  • notHelpfulOther - 1
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 0
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 1
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 0
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 0
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
  • ratingsId - 179215953729574122557719154C64DE97D9AB4C1232865CD08D5EC78D861683CF7DEAE90E1B1F69AAC